2010: Germany Study Tour

Sunday, May 9, 2010
Chapel in Germany

One of the many blessings of being associated with the Institute of Sacred Music is the biennial international study trip. In my time on the faculty, the ISM has traveled to Scandinavia, Mexico, and the Balkans, and now this year to Germany.

I wish to express my profound thanks first to my colleagues, Profs. Markus Rathey, James Taylor, and Teresa Berger, who labored long on the planning committee, and of course to our inimitable staff, particularly Andrea Hart, Laura Chilton, and (ex officio) Louise Johnson. They were joined by students Rachel Winter and Adam Peithmann. The preparation for the tour extended over two years and was supported by numerous colloquium lectures, student presentations, courses and performances. In fact, one could say that the preparation beforehand was every bit as valuable as the tour itself.

Naively, several of us thought this would be an “easy” tour. Germany, after all, is well known for its magnificent art, architecture, and music. But as anyone who has traveled there will know, it has also been the site of great conflict and even horror.

Here, you will find reflections from three of our students, each from a different perspective, though you will also see overlapping impressions. I invite you to read these carefully and make your own pilgrimages to these locations as you are able. I am confident that the lessons here are lasting ones that cross all boundaries of culture, race, and religion.

Study Tour to Germany

Sunday, May 9 

  • Travel day from New Haven to Munich

Monday, May 10 | Munich

  • Community lunch at Weihenstephan
  • Tour of Freising Cathedral

Tuesday, May 11 | Munich

  • Guided tour of the Residenz/Schatzkammer
  • Visit to St. Michael’s Church
  • Meeting with Pater Hermann Breulmann from the Jesuits at St. Michael’s
  • Evening Concert at Musikhochschule

Wednesday, May 12 | Munich

  • Lecture by Prof. D. Manfred Heim on Bavarian Church history at the University in Munich
  • Museum visits; pinakothek
  • Visit to Bavarian State Library; lectures by Margot Fassler, Peter Jeffrey, and Markus Rathey on liturgical and music manuscripts and prints of the Renaissance
  • Visit to the Gasteig; lecture by Prof. Dr. Bert Groen
  • Opening service for the Ecumenical Church Meeting at Marienplatz, Munich
  • Open-air concert at Ecumenical Church Meeting

Thursday, May 13 | Munich, Weimar

  • Visit to Vierzehn Heiligen; attend Ascension service
  • Community lunch at Goldener Hirsch
  • Travel to Weimar

Friday, May 14 | Weimar

  • Museum tours: Bauhaus Museum, Lizst House, and Goethehaus
  • Visit to Buchenwald 

Saturday, May 15 | Naumberg, Leipzig

  • Travel to Naumberg
  • Visit to Hildebrandt Organ St. Wenzel
  • Guided tour of Naumberg Cathedral
  • Travel to Leipzig
  • Visit to St. Thomaskirche, motette performance
  • Guided tour of the Bach Archiv
  • Concerts in Leipzig:  Opera Leipzig, Gewandhaus Leipsig

Sunday, May 16 | Leipzig

  • Tour of Nicolaikirche and organ
  • Morning service in St. Nicholas 
  • Visit to the Stasi Museum
  • Travel to Berlin

Monday, May 17 | Berlin 

  • Guided tour of Berlin Cathedral
  • Short service in Berlin Cathedral; visit with clergy
  • Guided walking tour of Berlin

Tuesday, May 18 | Berlin

  • Visit to Humboldt University Theology department
  • Lecture with Prof. Dr. Andreas Feldtkeller on interreligious and intercultural dialogue
  • Lunch with Humboldt University Theology students
  • Visit to Berlin Dahlem; Lecture with dr. Lars-Christian Koch, at the Phonogramm-Archiv Berlin about music and multiculturalism in Germany
  • ISM community dinner

Wednesday, May 19 | Berlin

  • Lecture with Prof. Dr. Jurgen Henkys, theologian, humn writer, Bonhoeffer expert at Petrisall
  • Free time in Berlin

Thursday, May 20 | Berlin

  • Travel from Berlin to New Haven

Student Reflections from the Study Tour

Compiled/Edited by Rachel Winter, MAR ‘11, Religion and Literature

As I recollect our trip to Germany, I am tempted to turn the experience into a text: to give it a reading, as one would interpret a novel or a symphony.  The instinct is natural enough for anyone who’s been at graduate school for at least a month or two; it’s only a matter of time before everything is a text, from news reports to night skies, and to give any subject this sort of treatment is, at some level, to take it seriously.  Our ten days together between Munich and Berlin deserve such attention, yet the experience comes back to me as fractured, unmanageably complex.  This complexity, of course, is key to the task of writing about history: finding clusters of causes, patterns of development, movements toward a certain kind of civilization.  

What each of us recalls from this trip will be different.  Yet in the student reflections that follow, a certain theme emerges: the problem of reconciling at once the beauty and virtuosity of German high culture, and the awful events of recent history, particularly of the Holocaust.  Whether these can even be reconciled, or may only be recognized separately for what they were, is a worthwhile question in itself.  Such questions will stay with us long after our trip together has found its place in the past.

“In the Beauty of Holiness”: Earthly Terror and Heavenly Music

After the hectic final home-stretch of the spring semester, every last hour spent studying for finals and writing term papers, the ISM study trip to Germany was a much-needed change of pace and scenery (although, looking back, I am not sure the pace was a slow one).  Over the course of two weeks, we managed to traverse from Hamburg down to Munich, stopping in Weimar, Leipzig and other points of interest as we made our way to our final destination of Berlin.  We saw spectacular art, architecture, and natural beauty, while at times we were confronted with the uncomfortable realities of a not-so-distant past.  It was this that I wrestled with the most as the trip went on.  But first, I would like to highlight the first part of my trip: an excursion to Hamburg with the organists, prior to the main study tour itinerary.

The organists, led by Martin Jean, spent three days in Hamburg and the surrounding area playing historical instruments of the North German school.  Our first destination after checking into the hotel was St. Jacobi, where we had the privilege of playing the renowned pipe organ built by Arp Schnitger in 1693 (with some pipework dating back even further).  The organ is one of the largest examples of Northern European organ building in the Baroque period, consisting of sixty stops and roughly 4,000 pipes.  I simply could not believe the incredible beauty of the sound produced.  Though the grandeur of the full organ was impressive and awe-inspiring, with its 32-foot reed in the pedal division, the most arresting and charming sounds came from drawing one or two stops.  Following this, we were guided through a collection of valuable and rare musical instruments in the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe by the collection’s owner, Dr. Andreas Beurmann.  The collection consists of harpsichords, spinets, virginals and clavichords from the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries as well as hammerklaviere, square pianos and other forms of piano from the eighteenth century up to the present day.  Though nearly falling over from sheer exhaustion and jet-lag, we were filled with childlike delight as we went around playing the collection’s instruments, almost all of which are in perfect working order.

Our stay in the Hamburg region gave us the opportunity to play several historic instruments, including the Huß-Schnitger organ (1675) at St. Cosmae and the Erasmus Bielfeldt organ (1731), both in Stade; a Stellwagen at St. Jacobi in Lübeck with pipework dating to 1467; and a Romantic-era Furtwängler (1859) at St. Petri in Buxtehude.  At St. Petri, the six organ students present gave a 30-minute recital to a crowd of about 35 people who received us with warm and hearty applause at the conclusion of the concert. I could go on and on about the beauty of each of these instruments, but one moment that stands out in my mind was at the Jacobikirche in Lübeck.  When we first heard the sound of the sixteen- and eight-foot principals of the organ’s main division, Martin Jean remarked that they had the quality and timbre of sackbuts (the predecessor of the modern trombone).  At that moment I wondered how people had gotten it so wrong in the 1950s and 60s: at that time, beautiful pipe organs from the turn of the century were ripped out and replaced with ones which were supposedly modeled on principles of North German organ building, but often characterized by weaker foundation tone and bright, often-times shrill mixtures.  The tone quality of the aforementioned principal stops was incredibly full and vocal, and the warmth of their sound was enough to make me forget about the chill of the unheated church building.

As an organist, I feel so lucky to have been able to play such instruments.  No secondhand knowledge can ever take the place of firsthand experience with such instruments, and the insight that experience gives us as performers of music from this era.  The organs we have at Yale in Dwight Chapel and Marquand Chapel give us a good idea of the instruments they are modeled on, but they do not replace experiencing the real thing.         

After several days in Munich, where we met the rest of our group, we headed towards Weimar, stopping at Vierzehnheiligen along the way to attend mass for Ascension Day.  The Rococo basilica was built between 1743 and 1772 to honor the Fourteen Holy Helpers, a group of saints venerated together in Roman Catholicism. This tradition began in the Rhineland in the fourteenth century, when their intercession was frequently invoked as protection against the Black Death.  From its beginnings in 1448, Vierzehnheiligen was a pilgrimage site, and remains so to the present day.  The organist who accompanied the service was a skilled improviser, and the music added a thrilling dimension to the drama of the liturgy, with many musical allusions to the image of God going up “with a triumphant shout” (Psalm 47:5).  To be able to attend Mass in such a beautiful space, charged with the emotional fingerprints of countless generations of pilgrims, created a memory I will cherish for years to come.

It was the experience of encountering this exceeding beauty, whether it was the craftsmanship of exquisite pipe organs, the lavish church architecture, or the incredible museums and former palaces of the Bavarian nobility, that made the experience of extreme ugliness at one of our stops so difficult to understand.

On our last day in Weimar, we went to the site of the former concentration camp of Buchenwald, now a memorial to the victims who perished there.  As we went through the remnants of cells, barracks, execution chambers, and the crematorium, the horror of the Holocaust became overwhelmingly real in a way that I hadn’t been prepared for.  One of the things I noticed as we went through the gates of the camp was the incredible view of the valley below, with its endless fields of yellow rapeseed flower.  It seemed surreal – almost a cruel mockery – that as prisoners entered the gates, they would have seen a similar glimpse of beauty, all the while trapped in a hellish existence from which there was no escape.

In the days leading up to the trip, my time had been consumed by writing term papers, the final one of which had been on Julian of Norwich and her Revelations on Divine Love.  I had discussed and analyzed her theology of a loving God and all its implications – a God whom we should not wonder at for allowing sin since he does not wonder at us for sinning – a God who turns every person’s sin into a greater glory.  What did I know about God?  How could I imagine a loving God standing in this very place?  How did Paul Schneider, the martyred Lutheran pastor, continue to preach the Good News from his confinement cell after months of torture?  All of a sudden, my paper seemed like twenty pages of nothing.

There can be no why to all the questions we may have about such things – no answer would ever suffice.  The impact of walking through Buchenwald has made a lasting impression and troubled me deeply for days afterward, as I kept wrestling with this paradoxical idea that the beauty of Weimar and the surrounding countryside could have co-existed with the ugliness of the concentration camp.  Yet paradox is at the heart of the Christian faith, and a few weeks after the trip, thinking back on the beauty of Vierzehnheiligen, the Abbey at Fürstenfeld, and other sites we visited, I realized the enormous role that an artist, especially a church musician, plays in this world, creating moments of beauty through music in the liturgy.  “Worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness,” the psalmist implores us (Ps. 96:9). In doing our part in Eucharistic worship, where a space between heaven and earth is created, we enable people to worship God in the holiness of beauty.  And it is through the encounter of such beauty that we are healed and able to face the ugliness that the world sometimes creates.  Surely this must have been one of the aims of the architects and artisans who built and decorated the Baroque and Rococo churches we visited – to create a space which blurred the lines between heaven and earth, and suspended earthly realities, giving a foretaste of the heavenly glory which awaits. My experience at Vierzehnheiligen gave me that, and if I can do the same thing for even one person in every service of worship, then I’ve done my job.

As people interested in where our particular craft or skill intersects the sacred, we at the ISM all play this role – creating the spaces where people can experience that intersection of the divine with the earthly, and in so doing, nourishing and strengthening their hearts and minds to better face the challenges the world inevitably presents.

Light and Dark: A (Musical) Search for Perspective

The choral conductors began their journey in Hamburg before the start of the main study tour, where Christoph Schlechter (AD ’11) had arranged joint master classes with the conducting students at his alma mater, the Hochschule für Musik und Theater. Yale faculty Jeff Douma and Maggie Brooks shared teaching duties with Professor Hannelotte “Jeanette” Pardall. The master classes were immensely enjoyable for all of us; not only did we have the opportunity to work with and be critiqued by a new and highly energetic teacher, but we were also able to observe our instructors working with the German students.  It was very inspiring for all of us to view our teachers from a more removed and objective perspective than usual, reinforcing and reaffirming the instruction we have received over the last one, two, or three years. The semi-bilingual method of instruction was also an exciting and unnerving wake-up call, reminding us that, yes, we were in Germany.

Another highlight of the conductors’ pre-trip was our excursion to Lübeck, where we attended a Sunday morning service at the Marienkirche. Aside from being one of the largest brick Gothic churches in the world, it was also the final workplace for Dietrich Buxtehude. The date of our visit was May 9, which also happened to be the anniversary of Buxtehude’s death, and we were fortunate enough to hear a performance of one of his cantatas. To be in that vast (albeit extremely cold) cathedral on that anniversary hearing one of his cantatas in the venue for which it was written was a truly remarkable experience.

After we joined up with the rest of the ISM, a one of the most striking experiences of the trip occurred while we were staying in Weimar. Having spent the morning visiting museums dedicated to some of the brightest artistic, literary, and musical minds in German history, we then boarded a bus and drove to Buchenwald Concentration Camp, only eight kilometers from the center of Weimar. For me, the contrast between the sheer luminosity of such artistic genius and the numbing horror of the Holocaust was overwhelming. In my mind, Markus Rathey articulated it best by pointing out that these two realities are inextricably linked; in establishing a German national identity, someone had to be ostracized, to be “the other people.” If the Wagners and Liszts were the best and brightest, to whom would they be compared? And, while we like to reassure ourselves that history won’t repeat itself, do we not see examples of nationalistic xenophobia in many corners of the world today – including our own? There are no easy answers.

The itinerary also provided happier and, in many ways, less challenging destinations. The list of wonders included a pilgrimage to Vierzehnheiligen, a stop at the Thomaskirche in Leipzig to hear a performance of a Bach cantata, another master class for the conductors with the conductor of the Berlin Radio Choir, Simon Halsey, and many priceless opportunities to hear live music, rehearsals, and lectures. The ever-present musical and intellectual power of the country, along with an almost ostentatiously efficient infrastructure that transported us, never ceased to amaze.

Though I am not generally one to seek cultural or moral lessons, a duty I feel ill equipped to handle, I would have us again ask ourselves: Are we in the USA, in our post-9/11 society, so different from a people reeling from economic and wartime crisis? Do we not rally behind charismatic speakers and take refuge in a feeling of national unity? Do we not sometimes staunchly idolize our own cultural icons, past and present? When examining these questions, the horrific truths of another country’s past suddenly feel much less comfortably distant. From this perspective we are reminded of our own humanity, that we are all capable of both extreme cruelty and extreme beauty.

Uncovering the Past: Forgetting and Remembering

In my impressions of Germany from our trip, a pattern stands out—not of a developing history, but of a culture and a society perpetually remaking itself.  To begin with, Germany presents us with objects and architecture bearing the marks of up to a thousand years of history.  The Munich Residenz, the palace complex of the Wittelsbach dynasty for four hundred years (1508-1918), began with the construction of the Neuveste castle in 1385.  In the centuries following, it acquired a ballroom, a treasury, gardens, an opera house, countless state and private apartments, and several royal chapels, before becoming a public museum in 1920.  Older buildings were sometimes remodeled, and sometimes destroyed to make room for new ones.  These changes reflected current movements in art and architecture, as well as particular royal tastes; thus the Residenz, as we experienced it in May, is a pastiche of the heights of Baroque, Rococo, and Neoclassical decorative styles.  elics in the museum—some dating back as far as the ninth century—reflect artistic tastes of their times, besides telling us something about their owners’ piety.  When we consider along with the developments of taste the destruction caused by fires, and, later, damage from 1944 bombings, the Residenz begins to seem not only a recovering pastiche of tastes, but also a memorial to lost lives, and to the devastation of disaster and wartime. 

Munich impressed many of us simply by its orderliness.  Between the swept streets, kempt gardens and strict adherence to traffic regulations, it seemed impossible that Munich had experienced extreme destruction such a short time ago.  World War II seemed a distant memory in this clean, well-engineered city.  And this is, I think, how it should be; there is life after war, after the Holocaust, after depravity and cruelty have run their awful courses.  The remaking of the Residenz over the centuries seems to have been driven by changing tastes, compounded by political ambitions.  Munich, on the other hand, aside from all practical reasons for rebuilding, had to be remade, I suppose, because German leaders were determined that the horrors of the 1930s and 40s would not haunt them forever, driving them to ruin.  The past could not be allowed to be decisive, and in that sense it had to be forgotten.

Yet by the same time, the past had to be remembered.  As we moved into East Germany, recent history seemed harder to avoid; its memorials were more vivid, more glaring.  Behind the literary and artistic glories of Weimar—Goethe and Schiller, literary icons of the eighteenth century; the Bauhaus movement and the short-lived Weimar Republic, Germany’s avante-garde and its first democracy—sits the internment camp Buchenwald, horribly intact, terrifyingly vivid.  In this case, almost nothing has been papered over; to the contrary, the suffering endured and horrors inflicted under Nazi rule are presented calmly and factually.  As we followed our young tour guide over Buchenwald’s grounds, our group was silent, taking in the stark facts of the past as she gently reported them.  Between 1937 and 1945, as a Nazi camp, and between 1945 and 1950, under the Soviet Secret Police, Buchenwald was more or less unknown to most citizens of Weimar; now it is uncovered, exposing us to the past we’d still rather not see. And see it we must, horrific as it is, because as we look at Buchenwald and try to understand it, we learn not only what has passed, but what must not pass again; we learn not only about those who suffered, but those who caused suffering; we see not only traces of our forebears, but traces of ourselves.  We leave Buchenwald mourning, arguing with ourselves, thinking and writing, fighting, working, praying, so that that such things may not be again.

Is it right to compare such things—on one hand, a state palace complex, expressive primarily of high culture and high tastes—and on the other, a work camp demonstrating some of the darkest manifestations of the human psyche?  In general, perhaps not; yet they have this in common.  Both offer extreme examples of how we respond to the past, and both responses are necessary.  It is not exactly a moral choice to redecorate a room at the Residenz, but it is not amoral either.  Such choices tell us not only what people wanted to preserve from the past, but also what they wanted life to be like in the present, and in the distant future.   Likewise, the choice to leave Buchenwald intact is not only ethical; it is a narrative choice, a choice that allows the historical truth to be told, and, perhaps, someday, understood.  We cannot shut out the past, and we cannot take it with us.  We can only take from it the knowledge of what human life can be, with all of its inconsistencies.